Cases 1 - 10 of 34
STOCKTON v. WHEELER et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
CENTURION STEVEN H. WHEELER, LAUREL HARRY, SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ABEL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CAIN ABEL
Defendant:
M. ADAMS, K. FEATHERS and J. WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WETZEL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13140
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JOSEPH WETZEL and SHAWN J WETZEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perez v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
Terrance Xavier Perez
Defendant:
J. Wetzel, Sgt. J. Jenkins, J. Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Rodney Anderson
Defendant:
K. Kauffman, J. Rivello, Ms. C. Neri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Rivello et al
as 3:2021cv01908
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez
Defendant:
J. Rivello, K. Kauffman, J. Spyker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario v. Rivello et al
as 3:2021cv01840
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
J. Rivello, K. Kauffman, J. Spyker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez, Jr. v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv01484
Plaintiff:
Fernando Nunez, Jr.
Defendant:
John J. Wetzel, Bernadette Mason, Linda White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David J Wetzel et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv03854
Plaintiff:
Constance L Wetzel, David J Wetzel and Nicole L Wetzel-Preciado
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WETZEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv35342
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
