Cases 1 - 10 of 12
YOUNG v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL J. YOUNG
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
YOUNG v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL J. YOUNG
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PERKINS et al
as 2:2018cv00427
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
SHIRLEY J. YOUNG, JEFFREY D. PERKINS by his guardian and next friend STEVEN O. PERKINS, ROBERT E. YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. BUTTS
as 1:2018cv01721
Respondent:
BUTTS
Petitioner:
ISRAEL J. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. IPPEL et al
as 1:2018cv01684
Defendant:
BRUCE IPPEL and WEXFORD MEDICAL
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL J. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv01014
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
ISRAEL J. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. CORIZON et al
as 1:2016cv00155
Defendant:
CORIZON, GEO, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL J. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BABCHUK et al v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01376
Defendant:
DIANNA ANDREWS, KEVIN W. CONDICT, MICHAEL L. HARLOWE and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM I. BABCHUK, M.D. and WILLIAM I. BABCHUK, M.D., P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. MENARD, INC.
as 1:2011cv01555
Third Party Plaintiff:
MENARD, INC.
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Third Party Defendant:
STANLEY DETECTIVE AGENCY, INC.
Plaintiff:
BENITA J. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cochran v. Lavers et al
as 3:2011cv00054
Defendant:
Richard M Lavers , William P Johnson , Edwin Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney J Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
