Cases 1 - 10 of 28
PIERRE v. GREENAWALT et al
as 2:2023cv02036
Plaintiff:
MARCARTON N. PIERRE
Defendant:
C. GREENAWALT, WARDEN MICHAEL ZAKEN, SGT. GEORGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Stokes v. Payson et al
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
Terrance J.M. Stokes
Defendant:
Lt. Payson, Warden Robert May, Sgt. O'pray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-2751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM WOLF, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. A. SANTOS and others
Debtor / Appellee:
MINDY ANDRETTI
STOKES v. PRITTS et al.
as 2:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE J.M. STOKES
Defendant:
PRITTS, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Lieutenant WHITAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
POPLAWSKI v. VILARINO et al
as 2:2021cv03084
Defendant:
JAYMMIE M. VILARINO, J.M. POPLAWSKI, HON. JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. POPLAWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. PA Department of Correction et al
as 1:2021cv00145
Defendant:
SCI Somerset, Lieutenant Whitaker, PA Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance J.M. Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. DeMatteis et al
as 1:2021cv00144
Defendant:
Claire DeMatteis and Centurion Health
Plaintiff:
Terrance J.M. Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Respondent:
Pharmatech Laboratory, C.O.1 Bullick, Fidel Clark(c)TM and others
Petitioner:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
