Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Owens v. Hancock Jr. et al
as 3:2023cv02025
Plaintiff:
David Owens
Defendant:
John F Hancock Jr., Larry Jahn, Randy Hasse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Parker v. San Francisco Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2021cv01026
Defendant:
San Francisco Sheriff's Department and San Francisco City and County
Plaintiff:
Tye Jahn Le'Dre Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schwartz v. Jahn
as 5:2018cv05784
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Schwartz, F
Defendant:
George Jahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. v. Prosperity Investments, LLC, et al
as 2:2018cv06547
Plaintiff:
Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Provision Holding, Inc.
Defendant:
Harold Jahn and Prosperity Investments, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pamela Jahn-Derian v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2013cv07221
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jahn-Derian
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Kaiser Permanente Group Long Term Disability Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
McGee v. County of Alameda et al
as 4:2012cv04286
Plaintiff:
Jahn McGee
Defendant:
County of Alameda and Gregory J. Ahern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jahns v. Nike Incorporated
as 3:2012cv00239
Plaintiff:
Philip Donald Jahns
Defendant:
Nike Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADP, Inc. v. Willits Motors Susanville, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv01256
Plaintiff:
ADP, Inc.
Defendant:
Willits Motors Susanville, Inc. and Don Jahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
