Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Young Jo, et al v. Six Unknown Names Agents or Mr
as 16-16703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO and JAIMES ENRIQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS OR MR. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, BARACK OBAMA
Young Jo, et al v. Six Unknown naes agents or Mr.
as 16-14061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO and JAIMES ENRIQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAES AGENTS OR MR. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, BARACK OBAMA
Jaimes-Enriquez v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00252
Petitioner:
Fermin Jaimes-Enriquez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jo et al v. Six unknown names agents or Mr. President of the United States, Barack Obama
as 1:2016cv01591
Petitioner:
Young Yil Jo and Jaimes Enriquez
Respondent:
Six unknown names agents or Mr. President of the United States, Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jaime Enriquez-Sameron v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72830
Petitioner:
JAIME ENRIQUEZ-SAMERON
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jaimes Enriquez v. Six Unknown Named Agents, et al
as 13-12943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAIMES ENRIQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS, or and BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States
Enriquez v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 1:2013cv01971
Plaintiff:
Jaimes Enriquez
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
United States v. Fermin Jaimes-Enriquez
as 12-3818
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Fermin Jaimes-Enriquez
Enriquez v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 1:2012cv02714
Plaintiff:
Jaimes Enriquez
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Mr. President of the United States Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
