Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Payton v. Browne et al
as 2:2023cv02387
Plaintiff:
Ance Payton
Defendant:
Jamar Browne and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beadle v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2022cv02578
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jerome Beadle
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Trey Matthew, Jamar Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Cookeville, Tennessee, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00004
Plaintiff:
Dylan L. Watson
Defendant:
Cookeville, Tennessee, City of, Martin Garcia and Jamar Minter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Blurton
as 1:2020cv01008
Defendant:
David Blurton
Plaintiff:
Jamar Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Fields et al
as 2:2019cv02284
Defendant:
FNU Byers, Kirk Fields, FNU Varner and others
Plaintiff:
Jamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grissett v. USA (JRG3)
as 2:2017cv00130
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jamar Vernest Neil Grissett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Norris v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02098
Plaintiff:
Terry Jamar Norris
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Centurion Medical Services, Don Willie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Schauman et al
as 3:2013cv00542
Plaintiff:
Terry Jamar Norris
Defendant:
Thomas Schauman and Terry L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. Cheatham County Jail et al
as 3:2009cv00492
Plaintiff:
Jamar Corsay Kimble
Defendant:
Cheatham County Jail, Jaush Lawrence, Gregg Jinnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. Cheatham County Jail et al
as 4:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jamar Corsay Kimble
Defendant:
Cheatham County Jail, Jaush Lawrence and Gregg Jinnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
