Cases 1 - 10 of 4,318
Spencer #529310 v. Ensing et al
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Spencer #529310
Defendant:
Matthew Ensing, Margaret Greiner, Brian Majerszyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cashbaugh et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cashbaugh, Christopher Daniels, Anthony Dexter and others
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of and Tony Moulatsiotis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Moorlet #409220 v. Corrigan
as 2:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Terrence Moorlet #409220
Respondent:
James Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlock v. City of Harper Woods et al
as 2:2024cv11122
Plaintiff:
James Carlock
Defendant:
City of Harper Woods, Glen Heaney, Matthew Closurdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hood #304765 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Trensario Mario Hood #304765
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calkin v. Wexford, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Calkin
Defendant:
SGT. Kristie Piskor, SGT. Anthony Vermeulen, CO Janice Vanhaltsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Walker #230537 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
James Edward Walker #230537
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Germany v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv11079
Plaintiff:
James Germany
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
