Cases 1 - 10 of 268
Rogers v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04071
Petitioner:
James Rogers
Respondent:
State of South Dakota, Kellie Wasko and Teresa Bittinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05016
Plaintiff:
Christopher James
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Schneider v. Badhand
as 3:2024cv03008
Plaintiff:
Justin James Schneider
Defendant:
Lt. Badhand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beeson et al v. CHS, Inc.
as 4:2024cv04048
Plaintiff:
Kristi Beeson and James Beeson
Defendant:
CHS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Schneider v. Corson County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Justin James Schneider
Defendant:
Corson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Wahl v. Fluke et al
as 3:2024cv03002
Petitioner:
James Christopher Wahl
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04182
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bowers v. Menard, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03020
Plaintiff:
James Bowers
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Rutledge v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv03018
Plaintiff:
James P. Rutledge
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith v. FedEx Freight Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
Kelsey James Smith
Defendant:
FedEx Freight Inc., Ozzy August Kienast and John Does 1 to 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
