Cases 1 - 10 of 23
SMITH v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00328
Plaintiff:
JAMES C SMITH, JR and JAYMIE DAVIS
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CAPTAIN LANE FELDMAN, SARGEANT GEORGE CARTER and others
Interested Party:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2020cv10681
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Plaintiff:
A Smith James and James A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 1:2017cv10607
Plaintiff:
James M. Smith and Cindy F. Smith
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmer, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES PALMER and MICHELLE PALMER
Plaintiff:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH LISTER, M.D., P.C.
Defendant:
FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC, GDC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Palmer, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES PALMER and MICHELLE PALMER
Plaintiff:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH R. LISTER
Defendant:
FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC, BARRY J. CADDEN and others
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Intervenor:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Norris, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOCELYN KAE NORRIS
Plaintiff:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH LISTER, M.D., P.C.
Defendant:
LINDA LUI LUONG, FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC and others
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Intervenor:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Smith v. Dickhaut
as 15-1770
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES J. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
Smith v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv12093
Plaintiff:
James R Smith
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fresenius USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Insight Health Corp.
as 1:2014cv12910
Plaintiff:
James Wirt Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Insight Health Corp. , Image Guided Pain Management, P. C. , Robert F. O'Brien, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: Artis, et al
as 14-1718
Respondent:
ANNETTE G. YOUNG, LARRY J. MCCULLOCH, PATRICIA C. MCCULLOCH and others
Petitioner:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Interested Party:
SHARON OVERSTREET, PAIN CONSULTANTS OF WEST FLORIDA, ROCHESTER BRAIN AND SPINE NEUROSURGERY & PAIN MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Defendant:
HOWELL ALLEN CLINIC, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
