Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Thomas (PS) et al v. CDOC
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
LL Cool J, Ice Cube, Jay-Z and others
Defendant:
CDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Felisha Parker and Laresha Parker
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James T Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. Tubbs et al
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hartley
Defendant:
Cheyenne Tubbs, Scott Burgess, Ian Druce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. City of Lawton et al
as 5:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
Mark H Long
Defendant:
City of Lawton, James T Smith, Detective Melanie Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Choice Hotels - Virginia
as 1:2022cv00770
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Choice Hotels - Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith and Msahafer
Defendant:
Timothy Steve Smith, Trans Act Bank, Net Spend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ayala-Santiago et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Ayala-Santiago and Rosa Isela Reyes-Martinez
Defendant:
James Darrel Smith, Charles Randal Davis, Fed Ex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Banner Bank v. Smith, et al
as 19-4131
Not Yet Classified:
JAMES M. SMITH, a Utah resident, LOREE C. SMITH, an individual and BANNER BANK
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00334
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Copeland v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2018cv00558
Plaintiff:
Lebron Copeland
Defendant:
Lawton City of , Comanche County Facilities Authority , James T Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
