Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Turner et al v. Avco Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Veronica Turner and Kevin Turner
Defendant:
Avco Corporation, Textron, Inc., Black Rome LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
SMITH v. BERRINGER et al
as 1:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. SMITH
Defendant:
CO1 BERRINGER, MS. KERSINICK and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv00973
Petitioner:
JAMES THOMAS SMITH
Respondent:
ERIC ARMEL, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv00121
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
JAMES BILLIEJO SMITH
SMITH v. S.C.I. BENNER TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2018cv00542
Plaintiff:
James R. Smith
Defendant:
SCI Benner Township and Rickey L. Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. S.C.I. BENNER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv01606
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant:
S.C.I. BENNER TOWNSHIP and RICKEY L. SHERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROBST, JR. et al v. CROSSETT, ESQ. et al
as 5:2016cv04051
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. BROBST, JR. , ROXANNE BROBST and KESHIA BROBST
Defendant:
DAVID W. CROSSETT, ESQ. , WILLIAM F. BROBST, SR. , SMITH LAW GROUP, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH v. SHASTA INC.
as 2:2014cv01094
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. SMITH
Defendant:
SHASTA INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CRAWFORD et al v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2014cv04148
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE CRAWFORD , JAMES CRAWFORD , ROCHELLE BROWN and others
Defendant:
KHALILAH ROBINSON, KHALIL MUNIR, TEQUINA SIMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. SMITH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
