Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023ct03245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. Dever et al
as 5:2023ct03153
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Levon Jones
Defendant:
James C. Dever, III, G. Alan DuBois, April Bun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Charles Hinton v. James Dever, III
as 22-6917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES C. DEVER, III, United States District Judge, PETER A. MOORE, Clerk of Court and UNITED STATES CORPORATION
Dixon v. Dever
as 5:2021ct03244
Plaintiff:
Dalton Alonzo Dixon
Defendant:
James C. Dever, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Dever
as 3:2021cv00424
Plaintiff:
Dalton Alonzo Dixon
Defendant:
Honorable Judge James C. Dever, III and James C. Dever, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dever et al
as 5:2020ct03285
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, James C. Dever, III and Bryan K. Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kunta Redd v. James Dever, III
as 20-7282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUNTA KENTA REDD
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL JAMES, United States District Attorney, ROBERT J. DODSON, United States District Attorney, JAMES C. DEVER, III, United States Federal Sentencing Judge and others
David Smith v. Judge Dever
as 20-7263
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JAMES C. DEVER, III and BRIAN K. WELLS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE SMITH
David Smith v. James Dever, III
as 20-7056
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES C. DEVER, III, BRYAN K. WELLS, TERRENCE W. BOYLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE SMITH
SIGLER v. DEVER III et al
as 1:2020cv01865
Defendant:
ARNEATHA A. GILLIS, JAMES C. DEVER III, CHARLES H. HENRY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THEODORE SIGLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
