Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Cooke v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
as 8:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
James Cooke
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cook et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv18124
Plaintiff:
Dawn Cook and James Cook
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv04273
Plaintiff:
Dafra G. Cook and James Cook
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. MobilePlay Partners, LLC
as 1:2013cv01711
Plaintiff:
James Cook
Defendant:
MobilePlay Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Cook et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv10163
Plaintiff:
Sue Cook and James Cook
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cook et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06393
Plaintiff:
Michelle Cook and James Cook
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moore, et al v. Shapiro & Burson, LLP
as 3:2014cv00832
Plaintiff:
Eric S Moore, Sr. and Brenda Moore
Defendant:
Shapiro & Burson, LLP , Aaron Reed , Robert Jones and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Sandra Waters-Levy , Christian Andrade , Camille Barnett and others
Consolidated_defendant:
Law Offices of Shapiro & Burson, LLP , Shapiro & Burson, LLP , Professional Foreclosure Corporation of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv03131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
