Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Sutton v. Chandler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01392
Plaintiff: Jason Lee Sutton, J Lee and Jennifer Lee Sutton
Defendant: Paula Chandler, Leslie E O'Connor, Maria Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. James Bennett
as 17-56737
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES DAVIS BENNETT
USA v. James Bennett
as 17-55625
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES DAVIS BENNETT
Reeves #263041 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00068
Plaintiff: Stephen D Reeves
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, M Davis, Mike Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Davis Bennett v. United States of America
as 8:2014cv01757
Petitioner: James Davis Bennett
Respondent: United States of America
Unknown: Diana L Pauli
Kenneth LaVeen v. James Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00886
Petitioner: Kenneth LaVeen
Respondent: James Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenneth LaVeen v. James Davis
as 2:2013cv03885
Respondent: James Davis
Petitioner: Kenneth LaVeen
Elem v. Robertson et al
as 4:2013cv00364
Plaintiff: Melvin Elem
Defendant: Alisha Renee Robertson, Unknown Dickson, Unknown Dollar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elem et al v. Robertson et al
as 4:2013cv00242
Plaintiff: Larry Elem and Melvin Elem
Defendant: Renee Alisha Robertson, J Walker, Channing Sydes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Babb, et al.
as 4:2013cv01191
Petitioner: Charles Anthony Brooks
Respondent: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO) Addendum Special Operations, M. Babb and James Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?