Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Stokes v. Darlington County Detention Center
as 4:2023cv06378
Plaintiff:
Eric Stokes
Defendant:
Darlington County Detention Center, James Hudson, Kelly Philbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Sandifer v. Coe et al
as 0:2023cv06240
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Allen Sandifer
Defendant:
Waddel Coe, Jay E. Cuttingham and James Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ham v. Hudson et al
as 4:2023cv02619
Plaintiff:
James Edward Ham
Defendant:
James Hudson and Mike Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dickey v. Hudson et al
as 4:2023cv02826
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dickey
Defendant:
James Hudson and Joseph Frierson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tyler v. Coe et al
as 9:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler and Larry James Tyler,
Defendant:
Waddell Coe and James Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dixon v. Hudson et al
as 6:2022cv02628
Plaintiff:
Jessie Allen Dixon
Defendant:
James Hudson and Diane Wilks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Johnson v. Hudson
as 4:2022cv03440
Plaintiff:
Christopher Antonio Johnson
Defendant:
James Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cockfield v. Kinney et al
as 4:2022cv02393
Plaintiff:
Davion Cockfield
Defendant:
Caroline Kinney, Neal Cusack, Tony Chavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tyler v. Hudson et al
as 9:2022cv01544
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler and Larry James Tyler,
Defendant:
James Hudson and Diann Wilks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tyler v. Hudson et al
as 9:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler
Defendant:
James Hudson and Diann Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
