Cases 1 - 10 of 25
VUCISH et al v. PHILLIPS et al
as 2:2023cv00786
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. VUCISH, M.D.V. and MICHELLE V. ALBERT
Defendant:
JAMES JOSEPH PHILLIPS, JOHN RYAN, THE CITY OF JEANNETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Mohaisen v. Conlin et al
as 1:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Saddam Mohaisen
Defendant:
James Joseph Conlin and Schneider National Carriers Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
LAWSON v. SHOUPPE et al
as 2:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOSEPH LAWSON
Defendant:
WARDEN WILLIAM SHOUPPE and DEPUTY WARDEN ETHEL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GIUFFRE et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOSEPH GIUFFRE and PETRA MARION MERRITT
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OWENS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2020cv00369
Petitioner:
LQ5286 JAMES JOSEPH OWENS and JAMES JOSEPH OWENS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burke v. Saylor et al
as 4:2020cv01271
Defendant:
Charles H. Saylor, Ed Greco, Esther Rhodes and others
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Burke, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSI III v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02460
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOSEPH ROSSI III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MATTIS v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2019cv03544
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOSEPH MATTIS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wilson v. Baltazar
as 3:2017cv01958
Petitioner:
James Joseph Wilson
Respondent:
Baltazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
