Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Eakins v. Austin Lloyd, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Annamarie F Eakins and Annamarie F. Eakins
Defendant:
Austin Lloyd, Inc, Austin Coins, Inc., Brandon E Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nowell v. Austin Coins, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bobby Nowell
Defendant:
Austin Coins, Inc, Eric P Lesak, Timothy James King and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Joshua James King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. King
as 22-1024
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James King
Dixon v. Blanckensee
as 20-1651
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Male Dixon, AKA James King
Defendant / Appellant:
Warden Barbara Von Blanckensee, Individually
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00066
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Joshua James King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
King v. The Village of Spring Valley et al
as 7:2017cv03260
Plaintiff:
James King, Jr.
Defendant:
The Village of Spring Valley , Keith Gonzalez and Unidentified Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04899
Defendant:
Pamela Brewster, City of New York, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Sonya Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tafari v. Gettman
as 13-1496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Gary Gettman, Corrections Sergeant, James King, Corrections Officer, Jason Rushlaw, Corrections Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
