Cases 31 - 40 of 57
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Bitener, et al
as 15-3699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BITENER, LT., T. JONES, SANCHEZ, DET. and others
Defendant:
MARCHANELLO, LT., KOEPPEN, GRANT and others
ROUDABUSH v. HOLLINGSWORTH et al
as 3:2015cv07838
Petitioner:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH , C. DYNAN , MCCOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Roudabush, Jr. v. McKool, et al
as 15-3187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MCKOOL, Lt., Supv. of SHU, JAMES A. HOLLINGSWORTH, Warden, C. DYNAN, Ass't Warden and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Bitener, et al
as 15-3137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. BITENER, MARCHANELLO, LT., T. JONES and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 15-3114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
A. W. WASOM, C/O GOBOAVICH, OIC STALLINGS and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Unknown "SIS" Federal Agents, et al
as 15-3112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. BITENER, CAPT. AEYES, ASST. WARDEN C. DYNAN and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 15-3113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
ROUDABUSH v. HYLTON et al
as 2:2015cv00376
Plaintiff:
James L. Roudabush, Jr
Defendant:
HYLTON, D. Lawhorne, Sterns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 15-2948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, And all its agents, employees, contractors and custodian
ROUDABUSH v. HOLLINGSWORTH et al
as 1:2015cv05944
Petitioner:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH , WASOM , GOBOAVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
