Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Chennette et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chennette, Larry Akins, Gary Alger and others
Defendant:
Porch.com, GoSmith Inc, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Edmund Edwards v. Charisse Edwards et al.
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Edmund Edwards
Defendant:
Charisse Edwards, Krista Edwards, Arlene Parkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Edmund Edwards v. Krista Edwards et al
as 2:2022cv08814
Petitioner:
Edmund Edwards
Respondent:
Krista Edwards and Charisse Edwards
Defendant:
Arlene Parkinson, Jeffrey D Calvin, Jack Esensten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Nathan Chennette, et al v. Porch.com, Inc., et al
as 20-35962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYLE ROBB, NATHAN CHENNETTE, SCOTT GLUBAY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENTON MARRELLI, MATTHEW EHRLICHMAN, GOSMITH INC. and others
Chennette v. Porch.com et al
as 1:2020cv00201
Plaintiff:
Nick Miller, David Frost, Adam Byerley and others
Defendant:
GoSmith Inc., Brenton Marrelli, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Payne et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01393
Plaintiff:
Gilda Payne and James Payne
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Crown Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Payne v. Ahlin
as 2:2015cv00535
Plaintiff:
James Payne
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Ahlin
as 1:2015cv00782
Plaintiff:
James Payne
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Allenby, et al.
as 2:2014cv02555
Plaintiff:
James Payne
Defendant:
Cliff Allenby, Audrey King, Tom Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Allenby, et al.
as 1:2014cv02044
Plaintiff:
James Payne
Defendant:
Cliff Allenby, Audrey King, Tom Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
