Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Smith v. de Barrena-Sarobe et al
as 1:2021cv01548
Plaintiff:
James R. Smith
Defendant:
Christopher L. de Barrena-Sarobe, David Pugh, Eleni Kousoulis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. S.C.I. BENNER TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2018cv00542
Plaintiff:
James R. Smith
Defendant:
SCI Benner Township and Rickey L. Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. S.C.I. BENNER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv01606
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant:
S.C.I. BENNER TOWNSHIP and RICKEY L. SHERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
James Smith v. George Hayman, et al
as 12-2203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Corrections (NJDOC), MICHELLE RICCI, Administrator of New Jersey State Prison (NJSP), RUSTY REEVES, Doctor, Director of Psychiatry and others
James Smith v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 11-2521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI, Administrator of New Jersey State Prison and PAULA DOW, The Attorney General of the State of New Jersey
SMITH v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2010cv06949
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. SMITH, III.
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KEVIN CONROY, E. COURTNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WILLOUGHBY et al
as 2:2010cv04906
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant:
WILLOUGHBY, BROWN, MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. RICCI et al
as 1:2010cv01398
Petitioner:
JAMES R. SMITH
Respondent:
MICHELLE RICCI and PAULA DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76837
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
