Cases 1 - 10 of 17
James Westley v. Brandeshawn Harris, et al
as 26-3280
Plaintiff:
JAMES WESTLEY
Defendant:
WARDEN BRANDESHAWN HARRIS, WARDEN LASHANN EPPINGER, MICHAEL BEEBE and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
McCullers v. Officer Lee et al
as 4:2025cv01824
Plaintiff:
James Westley McCullers
Defendant:
Officer Lee and Melisa Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blacher v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2025cv00256
Plaintiff:
Raymond Blacher
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Thomas Bickham, James Westley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blacher v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2024cv01736
Defendant:
Palmer, Frazier Bentley, Jeffery Travis and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Blacher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullers v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv03026
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Wesley Dolittle, Linda Perkins and others
Plaintiff:
James Westley McCullers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westley-Farrell v. New York Life Group Insurance Company of New York
as 6:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
James Westley-Farrell
Defendant:
New York Life Group Insurance Company of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
James Westley v. Brandeshawn Harris, et al
as 23-3177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WESTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BRANDESHAWN HARRIS, WARDEN LASHANN EPPINGER, MICHAEL BEEBE and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Radford v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
James Westley Radford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: James Westley
as 21-4000
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES WESTLEY
Respondent:
KENNETH BLACK, Warden and CHARMAINE BRACY, Warden
Westley v. Harris et al
as 4:2021cv01672
Plaintiff:
James Westley
Defendant:
Warden Brandeshawn Harris, Warden LaShann Eppinger, Michael Beebe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
