Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Moss v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2018cv02197
Defendant: John/Jane Doe 2 Supervisor of the York Field Office for Parole Board, John/Jan Doe 1 Regional Director of Parole, David Woodring and others
Plaintiff: Craig Moss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GALTOGBAH v. DOE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00126
Plaintiff: TOYLAWUO GALTOGBAH
Defendant: JOHN/JAN DOE, RHINEHART, WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HARPER v. PALLOTT et al
as 2:2011cv03016
Plaintiff: ANTHONY HARPER
Defendant: PALLOTT, DORINA VARNER, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUGGS v. STATE OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011mc00014
Plaintiff: JOHN HOWARD BUGGS, JR.
Defendant: STATE OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUSANNE NOELLE HUESTON, COUNSEL FOR JEFFERY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Extend Time
BUGGS v. STATE OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2010cv01569
Plaintiff: John Howard Buggs, Jr.
Defendant: State officials, department of corrections, Suzanne Noelle Hueston , Shirley Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUGGS v. STATE OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02701
Plaintiff: JOHN HOWARD BUGGS, JR.
Defendant: STATE OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUZANNE NOELLE HUESTON, SHIRLEY MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUGGS v. STATE OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02411
Plaintiff: JOHN BUGGS
Defendant: STATE OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUZANNE NOELLE HUESTON, SHIRLEY MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?