Cases 11 - 20 of 622
Giles v. Jane Does 1-2
as 6:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamar Giles
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kight et al v. Jane Doe #1
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Camaron Kight
Defendant:
Jane Doe #2 and Jane doe #1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arnold v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deandre Arnold
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Chronister, Deputy Adriel Gonzales, Deputy Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Does 1-205, et al v. Robert Olson, et al
as 24-10191
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOES 1-205, Ohio Action, JANE DOES 1-207, Ohio Action, MINOR DOES 1-4, Ohio Action and others
Defendant:
ROBERT W. OLSON, ROBERT KISTINGER, WILLIAM TSACALIS and others
MG Freesites LTD, et al v. Jane Doe
as 24-90001
Petitioner:
MG FREESITES LTD, MG FREESITES II LTD, MINDGEEK S.A.R.L. and others
Respondent:
JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE #2
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
ROSE v. ATMOS NATION LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
SAI ROSE
Defendant:
ATMOS NATION LLC, CHARLY BENASSAYAG, ELI EROCH and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
MORRIS v. GEO et al
as 3:2023cv24757
Plaintiff:
AREALEUS K MORRIS
Defendant:
GEO, MEDICAL PROVIDER AT BLACKWATER, L BERRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
