Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Adams v. Thrasher et al
as 2:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Maggie Adams
Defendant:
Officer Thrasher and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Raabe v. Harvey et al
as 2:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Nancy A. Raabe
Defendant:
Officer Harvey and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adams v. Thrasher et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Maggie Adams
Defendant:
Officer Thrasher and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Burgess v. City of Huntington et al
as 3:2021cv00582
Plaintiff:
Rocky Eugene Burgess
Defendant:
City of Huntington, Dakota Dishman, Officer Lawhon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. City of Gauley Bridge et al
as 2:2021cv00491
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
The City of Gauley Bridge and Larry Allen Clay, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc. of West Virginia et al
as 5:2021cv00321
Defendant:
Dr. Humayun Rashid, John/Jane Does, CO Richard Champion and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knotts et al v. Board of Directors of JW Ruby Memorial Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00050
Defendant:
The WV Board of Medicine, Board of Directors of JW Ruby Memorial Hospital, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Ellen Heine and Zachary Knotts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
