Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Farrell v. Harrell et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael Farrell
Defendant:
Mark Harrell, Larry Nixon and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe No.1 et al v. Rajveer LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
RAJVEER LLC, ATHARV, LLC, RAJPRABHU HOTEL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589 Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA)
Lemmons v. Doe et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00423
Defendant:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Victor K. Lemmons, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe "A" v. D & J Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00679
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe "A"
Defendant:
D & J Enterprises, Inc., Richard D. Starr, James L. Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc. v. Bentley et al
as 2:2015cv00620
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc. and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Robert Bentley and Stephanie McGee Azar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 1, et al v. Hobson, et al
as 2:2013cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 , Jane Doe 2 , John Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
Rich Hobson and Spencer Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bush v. Hetzel et al(INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00742
Plaintiff:
Wesley Maurice Bush
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, John Doe Anglen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQuarley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00723
Plaintiff:
Carlos McQuarley
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, John Doe Anglen, John Doe Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortner v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00721
Plaintiff:
Darelle Fortner
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Jane Doe Caffie, John Doe Anglen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loder et al v. McKinney
as 2:2011cv00979
Plaintiff:
Charelle Loder , Jack Doe , Jane Doe and others
Defendant:
Reese McKinney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
