Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cabozzi v. Anna Jaques Hospital
as 1:2024cv10792
Plaintiff:
Gary Cabozzi
Defendant:
Anna Jaques Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Ross v. Pike, et al
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
PIKE, Administrator at Somerset County Jail, D. GRAY, JAQUES, Sargent at Somerset County Jail and others
ROSS v. PIKE et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
PIKE, D GRAY, JAQUES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bassett v Blitt
as 1:2021cv10899
Defendant:
Cameron Rose doing business as Colton Grey, John Doe #14 doing business as Magdeline St. Michaels, Vivid Canada Entertainment, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leah Bassett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Lopez v. Milo St. Jaques et al
as 1:2020cv10183
Defendant:
Rasier LLC, Milo St. Jaques, Simone Abraham and others
Plaintiff:
Albert A. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jaques v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00293
Defendant:
Getinge AB, Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Richard Jaques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis et al v. Anna Jaques Hospital
as 1:2018cv12448
Plaintiff:
Renee Pelechowiez, Jeanne Dennis and Jill Mosher
Defendant:
Anna Jaques Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Peckham et al v. Board of Selectmen et al
as 3:2016cv30061
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Peckham and Nancy M. Peckham
Defendant:
Board of Selectmen, Dan Jaques, David Berndt and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF MAINE INC et al v. DUNLAP et al
as 2:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF MAINE INC , JORGE MADERAL , SUSAN POULIN and others
Defendant:
MATTHEW DUNLAP , JULIE FLYNN , TRACY WILLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
