Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Cardell Sanders, Jr. v. Genesee County, MI, et al
as 22-1596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARDELL SANDERS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GENESEE COUNTY, MI, PAUL WALLACE, JAY PARKER and others
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv30295
Plaintiff:
JAY PARKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Genesee County et al
as 2:2020cv13014
Defendant:
Sean Poole, Genesee County, Shana Mccallum and others
Plaintiff:
Cardell Sanders, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Spraberry CGC, Inc. v. Parker
as 7:2019cv00188
Plaintiff:
Spraberry CGC, Inc.
Defendant:
Jay Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spraberry GCG, Inc. v. Parker
as 5:2019cv00151
Plaintiff:
Spraberry GCG, Inc.
Defendant:
Jay Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRESSER et al v. NORMS et al
as 1:2018cv00426
Defendant:
ROBERT A NORMS and ROBERT BASSETT
Plaintiff:
JAY PARKER LUNT DRESSER, LAUREN ZARILLO, LINDA BASSETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRESSER v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2018cv00317
Defendant:
CARON, MARTIN, FEERO and others
Undetermined:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Plaintiff:
JAY PARKER LUNT DRESSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRESSER et al v. MUNICIPAL REVIEW COMMITTEE INC et al
as 1:2018cv00172
Plaintiff:
JAY PARKER LUNT DRESSER and MATERIALS RECOVERY SOLUTIONS
Defendant:
MUNICIPAL REVIEW COMMITTEE INC, FIBERIGHT LLC and COVANTA ENERGY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rojas et al v. Ben-Nat Del. & Rest. Inc. Deli & Restaurant et al
as 1:2015cv06665
Defendant:
Ben-Nat Del. & Rest. Inc. and Jay Parker
Plaintiff:
Samy Omar Cano, Jose Cerezo and Gustavo Rojas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Laury v. Jevirell et al
as 2:2015cv13365
Plaintiff:
Darrin Laury
Defendant:
Mechelle Jevirell, John Battles, Robert Weiss and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
