Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Flores et al v. JBM Janitorial Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01263
Plaintiff:
Angel Flores , Cesar Hernandez , Deborah Rivera and others
Defendant:
JBM Janitorial Maintenance, Inc., KRC Floor Maintenance, Inc., Viridiana Garcia a/k/a Viridiana Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tacuri v. JBM PM Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01782
Plaintiff:
Juan Tacuri
Defendant:
JBM PM Associates, Inc. and Jay B. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Curry v. JBM Envelope Company Employee Benefit Plan et al
as 3:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Debra Curry
Defendant:
JBM Envelope Company Employee Benefit Plan and Kanawha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Menzia v. JBM Security Systems LLC
as 2:2014cv00886
Defendant:
JBM Security Systems LLC
Plaintiff:
Justin Menzia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Luther Service v. JBM Estates NY LLC et al
as 1:2012cv02393
Plaintiff:
Luther Service
Defendant:
JBM Estates NY LLC, Hager Management Inc., 1800 Albermarle Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. JBM, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02939
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
JBM, Inc. , Directech Holding Company, Inc. , DIRECTV Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Laichev et al v. JBM, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02938
Plaintiff:
Mourad K. Laichev and Eugene Leybman
Defendant:
JBM, Inc. , Directech Holding Company, Inc. , DIRECTV Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Richter, Theodore v. JBM Security Systems LLC
as 3:2010cv00403
Plaintiff:
Theodore Richter
Defendant:
JBM Security Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BELL v. JBM, INC.
as 1:2009cv01279
Plaintiff:
JAMES BELL and JAMES BELL
Defendant:
JBM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. JBM, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00642
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
JBM, Inc., Directech Holding Company, Inc. and DIRECTV, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
