Cases 41 - 50 of 86
McClellan v. White et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen McClellan
Defendant:
Alicia White and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery Oppedahl, et al v. Mobile Drill International Inc
as 17-1925
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeffery Allen Oppedahl and Angela Marie Oppedahl, Next friend WTO Next friend MJO Next friend SMO
Defendant - Appellee:
Mobile Drill International, Inc., also known as Mobile Drill, L.L.C., formerly known as Mobile Drill Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Central Mine Equipment Company, USExploration Equipment Company and Navistar, Inc., formerly known as International Truck and Engine Corporation, formerly known as International Harvester Co.
McClellan v. Howard
as 5:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen McClellan
Defendant:
Steve Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClellan v. Holland et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen McClellan
Defendant:
Sharon McSwain Holland and Mary Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClellan v. Hudson (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen McClellan
Defendant:
John Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolowski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2016cv02049
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Bolowski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sikes v. USA
as 1:2016cv00533
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeffery Allen Sikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Webb v. Strode et al
as 1:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Webb
Defendant:
Jackie Strode and Jamie Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClellan v. Jones (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen McClellan
Defendant:
Karla Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02041
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Ryan
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
