Cases 11 - 20 of 505
(HC) Scott v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2020cv01820
Petitioner:
Shaheed Scott, Sr. and Rodney L. Scott
Respondent:
D. Artis, R. L. Briggs, G. Thumser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Scott v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2020cv01223
Petitioner:
Shaheed Scott, Sr.
Respondent:
D. Artis, R. L. Briggs, G. Thumser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Garner et al v.United States of America, et al
as 2:2020cv05717
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Robert Maeshack, Darren Williams and others
Defendant:
Dr. Felix Igbinosa, Chris Meyer, Dwight Winslow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hash v. Giacomazzi et al
as 5:2020cv01116
Defendant:
S. Lucas, C. Remillard, R. Persaud and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jones v. Beard et al
as 2:2019cv00461
Defendant:
C. Cryer, Jeffrey Beard, Renee Kanan and others
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Lashay Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashker v. Beard et al
as 3:2018cv06350
Defendant:
Susan Hubbard, Hightower, Manual Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Ashker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Hardney v. James Ferguson, et al
as 18-15688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN FREDERICK HARDNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. FERGUSON, JEFFREY BEARD and STEVEN TUCKER
Ross Curtis v. Jeffrey Beard
as 18-55490
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROSS J. CURTIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Prisons California Department of Corrections
Charles Quillin v. Hunter Anglea, et al
as 18-15587
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES CAMERON QUILLIN
Respondent - Appellee:
HUNTER ANGLEA, Acting Warden, JEFFREY BEARD, Doctor and SECRETARY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
McQueen v. Brown et al
as 2:2018cv00766
Plaintiff:
Lamar McQueen
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey Carrick, Medical Executive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
