Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Guarascio v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022ct03172
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Guarascio
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUARASCIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00746
Defendant:
RJN, JEFFREY ROSEN, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL GUARASCIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Allah a/k/a Kerr, Kevin v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv00199
Petitioner:
Allah a/k/a Kerr, Kevin and Kevin Kerr
Respondent:
Jeffrey Rosen, Merrick Garland and Warden of USP-Allenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Nduwimana v. Feeley et al
as 1:2021cv00090
Defendant:
Jeffrey Rosen, Jeffrey Searls, Thomas E. Feeley and others
Petitioner:
Apollinaire Nduwimana
Respondent:
David Pekoske, Jeffrey Searles, Robert M. Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hassan v. Rosen et al
as 1:2021cv00082
Defendant:
Thomas E. Feeley, Jeffrey A Rosen, Peter Gaynor and others
Petitioner:
Muhammad Hassan and Mr. Muhammad Hassan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
