Cases 41 - 50 of 218
Lin v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv07173
Plaintiff:
Ming Hui Lin
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Leon Rodriguez, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555
REINHARD v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv01807
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA L. REINHARD
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , PAUL ZUKUNFT and MATTHEW BELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ANGULO et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv01784
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ, KATHY A. BARAN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIELA CASTILLO ANGULO and FELIPE RIVERA HERRERA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
IVANA et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv04790
Plaintiff:
ATANASHKOVA IVANA and JAMES DYLAN T.
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
IBRAHIM v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2016cv01719
Plaintiff:
HISSEIN BOURMA IBRAHIM
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
LANDAVERDE v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2016cv00431
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL LANDAVERDE
Defendant:
LEON RODRIGUEZ, SEAN MURPHY, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Kanam v. Department of Natural Resources, et al
as 3:2016cv05702
Plaintiff:
Kurt Kanam
Defendant:
Department of Natural Resources , Office of Peter Goldmark and Office of Jeh Charles Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Pang v. Zanotti et al
as 1:2016cv00977
Petitioner:
Linru Pang
Respondent:
Kimberly Zanotti, Leon Rodriguez and Jeh Charles Johnson
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Saleh v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv07652
Plaintiff:
Gowahara Saleh
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson , James B. Comey, Jr. , Thomas M Cioppa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Isse v. Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv01890
Plaintiff:
Fardowsa Abdiwali Isse
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Leon Rodriguez, Ron Rosenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
