Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Abrams v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2022cv05990
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ray Abrams
Defendant:
Jeffrey Shaffer, Chad M Enright and Allyson Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrams v. Enright
as 3:2022cv05826
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ray Abrams
Defendant:
Chad M Enright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Jaggers v. Randy Valley
as 22-35510
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSE RAY JAGGERS
Respondent / Appellee:
NEVILLE LIZ, Warden and RANDY VALLEY, Warden
Jaggers v. Liz
as 1:2021cv00421
Petitioner:
Jesse Jaggers and Jesse Ray Jaggers
Respondent:
Neville Liz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cruz et al v. Concord Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv05469
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Aguilar, Luis Cruz, Luis Ramirez Carramza and others
Defendant:
Concord Police Department, U.S. Attorney Office, Contra Costa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School, et al
as 20-16674
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE L. WILBURN, SEAN JAMES BIAS, STEPHANIE R.C. KANG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Michael Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School, et al
as 20-16537
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE L. WILBURN, SEAN JAMES BIAS, LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C., LLG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School District/Special Education Local Plan Area (Diablo) et al
as 3:2020cv03368
Defendant:
City of Concord, Jose A. Espinoza, Darryl R. Saffold and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jesse Ray Bennett v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv10232
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jesse Ray Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Abrams v. Bremerton Municipal Prosecutor et al
as 3:2019cv05843
Defendant:
Bremerton Police, David Walker, Bremerton Municipal Prosecutor and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ray Abrams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
