Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lee v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 4:2026cv00104
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Lee
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Superintendent Wendy Nicholas, John Does Correctional Officers 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carey et al v. Brand et al
as 3:2025cv00195
Plaintiff:
Paul Carey and Jessica Carey
Defendant:
John Brand and Amy Brand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Carey v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Jessica Carey
Defendant:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC doing business as XFINITY
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carey v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv60008
Plaintiff:
Jessica Carey
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc. and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC doing business as Xfinity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carey v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as FLS/0:24-CV-60008
Plaintiff:
Carey and Jessica Carey
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc, Citrix Systems, Inc. and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC doing business as Xfinity
Bautista v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
Noel Bautista
Defendant:
Jessica Carey, Bernidett Mason and John Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Passarella v. Carey et al
as 3:2020cv00928
Defendant:
Jessica Carey and John Wetzel
Plaintiff:
William Passarella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Passarella v. Mason et al
as 3:2020cv00807
Defendant:
Mr. Viney, Jessica Carey, Major Damore and others
Plaintiff:
William Passarella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Passarella v. Carey et al
as 3:2019cv00732
Defendant:
Jessica Carey, Supt. DelBalso and John Wetzel
Plaintiff:
William Passarella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Funk v. Casey et al
as 1:2019cv00133
Plaintiff:
Charles Funk
Defendant:
Jessica Casey, John Wetzel, Theresa Delbalso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
