Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CUTTLER PRODUCE, INC. v. BOSTON CHICKEN OF NJ, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04551
Defendant:
JIGNESH PANDYA, BOSTON CHICKEN OF NJ, LLC, JAY PANDYA and others
Plaintiff:
CUTTLER PRODUCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Tejeda v. Boston Market Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv01497
Plaintiff:
Jose Tejeda
Defendant:
Boston Market Corporation doing business as Boston Market, Boston Chicken of AZ LLC doing business as Boston Market, Unknown Parties named as John Doe Corporations I-XX doing business as Boston Market and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. v. Pandya et al
as 8:2020cv00859
Defendant:
Shri Girijatmaj, LLC, 2008 W. Oregon Ave., LLC, 2105 Burlington, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
MARTIN v. RONAK FOODS LLC et al
as 5:2020cv01261
Defendant:
KRUPA PATEL, RONAK FOODS LLC and JIGNESH PANDYA
Plaintiff:
COREY MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS v. PANDYA
as 2:2020cv00405
Plaintiff:
CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS
Defendant:
JIGNESH PANDYA
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Terra Pell City LLC v. Pandya Burgers of Alabama LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00068
Defendant:
Adam Picow, Ronak Capital LLC, Pandya Burgers of Alabama LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Terra Pell City LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. RONAK FOODS LLC et al
as 5:2019cv02625
Defendant:
KRUPA PATEL, RONAK FOODS LLC and JIGNESH PANDYA
Plaintiff:
COREY MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
A.V. LAND & BUILDING ENTERPRISES, LLC v. PANDYA
as 2:2018cv00876
Plaintiff:
A.V. LAND & BUILDING ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant:
JIGNESH PANDYA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv08127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
