Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Kelsey Smith v. Michael Whitsel
as 24-1694
Plaintiff:
KELSEY JILL SMITH, as Administrator of the Estate of Dalynn Kee, and on behalf of her Next of Kin
Defendant:
MICHAEL WHITSEL
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv10151
Plaintiff:
JILL SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Erika King et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05008
Plaintiff:
Erika King, Nona King, William King and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
King et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
Erika King, Nona King, William King and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
King et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00812
Plaintiff:
King, Erika King, Nona King and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Rogers v. Aspen Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Sally Rogers
Defendant:
Aspen Technology, Inc., Antonio Pietri, Jill Smith and others
WHITFIELD v. ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00872
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC., ANTONIO PIETRI, JILL SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Khan v. Aspen Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Altaf Khan
Defendant:
Aspen Technology, Inc., Antonio Pietri, Jill Smith and others
Ciccotelli v. Aspen Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00581
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Defendant:
Aspen Technology, Inc., Antonio Pietri, Jill Smith and others
Gaylord v. Aspen Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Gaylord
Defendant:
Aspen Technology, Inc., Antonio Pietri, Jill Smith and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
