Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Ashelman v. PrimeCare Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Sean A. Ashelman
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical Inc., Selegrade, Dieago Remenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00478
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. Schneck et al
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Deshon T. Garrison
Defendant:
J. Schneck, Lieutenant Kaufman, John/Jane Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parrish v. Attorney General of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Donte Darrell Parrish
Defendant:
Attorney General of Pennsylvania, County of York, Warden Adam Ogle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adisa v. Sirona et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Jimi Adisa
Defendant:
Dentsply Sirona, Balji Prabhu and John/Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Negron v. Sam et al
as 1:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
Jerry Negron
Defendant:
Ms. Sam, Mr. Able, Sgt. Schiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denman v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv01918
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Denman
Defendant:
John Wetzel, George Little, Laurel Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Crawford
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Doe
as 4:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
Antoine DeWayne Walker
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
