Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Edmiston v. Borrego
as 22-50102
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shanon Edmiston, Individually, Helen Holman, as dependent administrator of, and on behalf of, LISA WILLIAMS a/k/a LISA SCHUBERT, E.S., J.S. #1, J.S. #2 and Shanon Edmiston, the ESTATE OF JOHN ROBERT SCHUBERT, JR., and JOHN ROBERT SCHUBERT, JR.'s heirs-at-law
Defendant / Appellant:
Oscar Borrego, Sr., Oscar E. Carrillo and Peter E. Melendez
Ronald Ogle, et al v. Sevier Cnty Rgnl Planning Comm, et al
as 19-6327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BETTY OGLE, RONALD W. OGLE, JOHN C. SCHUBERT, dba High Bridge Development Partnership and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SEVIER COUNTY, TN and SEVIER COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
SCHUBERT v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51571
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. SCHUBERT
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SCHUBERT v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv77545
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. SCHUBERT
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ogle et al v. Sevier County Regional Planning Commission et al
as 3:2009cv00537
Plaintiff:
Ronald W Ogle, Ronald W Ogle, Betty Ogle and others
Defendant:
Sevier County Regional Planning Commission and Sevier County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John A. Schubert v. Acands, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-60964
Defendant:
Acands, Inc
Plaintiff:
John A. Schubert
SCHUBERT v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60964
Plaintiff:
JOHN A SCHUBERT
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC., ALLIED SIGNAL, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SCHUBERT v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, THE et al
as 2:2009cv60964
Plaintiff:
JOHN A SCHUBERT, JOHN A SCHUBERT and JOHN A SCHUBERT
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, THE, A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENG INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
