Cases 31 - 40 of 734
Williams v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv03565
Plaintiff:
John T Williams
Defendant:
Richard J Sullivan, Debra A Livingston, Robert A Katzmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Williams v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
Richard J Sullivan, Debra A Livingston, Robert A Katzmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Cohen et al
as 1:2023cv03045
Plaintiff:
John T Williams
Defendant:
Mark H Cohen, Steven D Grimberg, Thomas W Thrash, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jean Dominique Morancy, et al v. Sabrina Salomon, et al
as 23-12248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN DOMINIQUE MORANCY and L.M.
Defendant / Appellee:
SABRINA ALEX SALOMON, GERALD FRANCIS ZNOSKO, ANGELA LAMBIASE and others
Williams v. Medical City of Dallas
as 3:2023cv01516
Plaintiff:
John E Williams
Defendant:
Medical City of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
v. Association of American Railroads et al
as 2:2023cv02095
Defendant:
Association of American Railroads, Dave Yost, Commissioner Jenifer French and others
v. Association of American Railroads et al
as 2:2023oe02095
Defendant:
Association of American Railroads, Dave Yost, Commissioner Jenifer French and others
Association of American Railroads v. Yost et al
as 2:2023cv02096
Plaintiff:
Association of American Railroads
Defendant:
Dave Yost, Commissioner Jenifer French, Commissioner Daniel R Conway and others
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv05453
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
