Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BARNARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv70704
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN D BARNARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnard v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv30075
Plaintiff:
John D. Barnard
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Sikes et al v. Northeast Lightning Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00502
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sikes , Joel A. Barnes , Adam Corcoran and others
Defendant:
Northeast Lightning Protection, LLC, James G. Barnard and John L. Barnard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas et al v. Anderson et al
as 1:2011cv09510
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas , Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and Wilmington Trust Company
Defendant:
John F. Barnard, Central Pension Fund , D.c. retirement funds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS et al v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2011cv01024
Plaintiff:
DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS , LAW DEBENTURE TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK and WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
JANICE WILLIAMS ANDERSON, JOHN F. BARNARD, CENTRAL PENSION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARNARD v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv67431
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. BARNARD
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. , THE BUDD COMPANY, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John A. Barnard v. American Standard, Inc., et al.
as VAE/2:09-CV-09648
Plaintiff:
John A. Barnard
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc
Barnard v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv09648
Petitioner:
John A. Barnard, John A. Barnard, John A. Barnard and others
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., The Budd Company, Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
