Cases 1 - 10 of 12
John C. Rodriguez v. R. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01437
Plaintiff:
John C. Rodriguez
Respondent:
R Madden and Valencia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
John C. Rodriguez v. R. Madden et al
as 2:2022cv05519
Plaintiff:
John C. Rodriguez
Defendant:
R. Madden and Correctional Officer Valencia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv02268
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Dr. Thomas,,
Plaintiff:
John C. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Quezada et al v. Franklin Madison Group, LLC
as 3:2019cv02153
Plaintiff:
Maria Quezada and John M. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Franklin Madison Group, LLC and Affinion Benefits Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Angela Lockhart et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2007cv01680
Plaintiff:
Faustino Del Valle, Karen Mickle, Naomi Cabrera and others
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Lee Baca and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Petitioner:
Pierre B Nadeau
Interested Party:
Michael Ascolese and Bruce Vallerand
Intervenor:
ALADS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
R.S. et al v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2014cv00589
Defendant:
City of Santa Ana, DOES, Officer Peter C Picone and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Hallstrom and R.S.
McClellan v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Charles McClellan
Defendant:
John R Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haines v. Rodriguez
as 2:2010cv03212
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Haines
Defendant:
John R. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLoney v. Rodriguez
as 2:2010cv01849
Plaintiff:
Rickey B DeLoney
Defendant:
John R Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Cate
as 3:2009cv02645
Petitioner:
John Gutierrez Rodriguez
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
