Other Statutes Cases
US v. Samuel Abraham We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-4790
Defendant / Appellant: SAMUEL JOHN ABRAHAM, a/k/a Jamal S. Ibrahim, a/k/a J. Samuel Ibrahim, a/k/a John S. Wynn
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Birdwell v. Glanz, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5031
Defendant / Appellee: VIC REGALADO, Sheriff of Tulsa County, in his official capacity, NURSE CUNNINGHAM, ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SCOTT BIRDWELL
Abraham v. Cawley & Bergmann, LLP
as 2:2015cv00279
Plaintiff: John Abraham
Defendant: Cawley & Bergmann, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Achari et al v. Signal International, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv06218
Plaintiff: Lakshmanan Ponnayan Achari , Kodakeril Baby Biji , Xavier Disoliyan and others
Defendant: Signal International, LLC , Signal International, Inc. , Malvern C. Burnett and others
Consol_defendant: Indo-Amerisoft LLC, Kurella Rao, J&M Associates, Inc. of Mississippi and others
Consol_plaintiff: Varghese Kurisinkal Devassy , George Chacko Edavazhickal , Ampattu Varughese Mathew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chakkiyattil et al v. Signal International, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00318
Plaintiff: George Paily Paulose Chakkiyattil , Chandrasekhara Pillai Rajesh Chemmanappilly , Sukumar Moses Dokka and others
Defendant: Signal International, LLC , Signal International, Inc. , Malvern C. Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
John Abraham v. Daniel Paramo
as 12-73498
Petitioner: JOHN ABRAHAM
Respondent: DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
John Abraham v. Daniel Paramo
as 12-70807
Petitioner: JOHN ABRAHAM
Respondent: DANIEL PARAMO
John Abraham v. E.D. Bullard Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-62441
Plaintiff: John Abraham
Defendant: E.D. Bullard Co

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?