Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Lee v. City of Brooklet et al
as 6:2018cv00127
Defendant:
Lawrence Norville Douglas Meyer III, Charles Dutton, John Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Cindy Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Baker et al
as 6:2018cv00126
Defendant:
Charles Dutton, John Baker, City of Brooklet and others
Plaintiff:
Angella Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bagby v. Baker et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00903
Plaintiff:
Dwain Matthew Bagby
Defendant:
John Baker, Ventress Correctional Facility, Ventress Classification Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2016cv00232
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ERIN GRAY, SR
Defendant:
CORY W MARTIN, HOUSTON HEALTHCARE, BABATUNDE FAGIMAYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2015cv00847
Petitioner:
John Baker
Respondent:
State of Alabama, Madison County Alabama and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baker v. Baker
as 0:2014cv61838
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Hansen Baker
Defendant:
Richard John Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
Baker v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01043
Plaintiff:
John Baker
Defendant:
Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. and One World Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Tiger Enterprises of Tyrone, Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv01998
Plaintiff:
John Baker
Defendant:
Tiger Enterprises of Tyrone, Inc. and Tricia Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
COMMUNITY COFFEE COMPANY LLC v. BAKER
as 4:2009cv00311
Plaintiff:
COMMUNITY COFFEE COMPANY LLC
Defendant:
JOHN BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Baker et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 9:2009cv80898
Plaintiff:
John Baker and Delana Baker
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
