Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BALLARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15016
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN BALLARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BALLARD et al v. OLIVE LEAF LANDSCAPING INC.
as 1:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
JOHN BALLARD and MID CENTRAL OPERATING ENGINEERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
OLIVE LEAF LANDSCAPING INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BALLARD, et al. v. BEVILLE EXCAVATING LLC
as 1:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEE JOHN BALLARD, MID CENTRAL OPERATING ENGINEERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and JOHN BALLARD
Defendant:
BEVILLE EXCAVATING, LLC and BEVILLE EXCAVATING LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Ballard v. Amidon et al
as 9:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
John Ballard, Jr.
Defendant:
Cindy Amidon and Mayo Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
