Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BOSTICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02289
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOHN BOSTICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03072
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO AVILA, JACOB ZIMMERMAN, JOSHUA THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02057
Plaintiff:
Francisco Avila, Jacob Zimmerman, Joshua Thompson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Larry Davis v. Kris Ockomon, et al
as 10-2589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KRIS OCKOMON, individually and as a Mayor of the City of Anderson, DICK WILEY, individually and as member of the Safety Board for the City of Anderson, JOHN BOSTICK and others
Roderick Goston v. Tony Jones, et al
as 10-12309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK D. GOSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY JONES, as City Police Chief, Gainesville FL., JOHN BOSTICK and MOSES ROCHELLE
GOSTON v. JONES et al
as 1:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
RODERICK D GOSTON
Defendant:
TONY JONES, JOHN BOSTICK and MOSES ROCHELLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goston v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00218
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Goston
Defendant:
Tony Jones, John Bostick and Moses Rochelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. BOSTICK
as 1:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GRAHAM
Defendant:
JOHN BOSTICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PITTMAN v. CHIEF OF POLICE et al
as 1:2008cv00118
Plaintiff:
ALIHANDRO PITTMAN
Defendant:
CHIEF OF POLICE, JOHN BOSTICK, CHARLES OWENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
