Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Brooks v. Cain et al
as 2:2013cv05266
Plaintiff:
John Brooks
Defendant:
Burl Cain and James M LeBlanc
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Brooks v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 12-30868
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Brooks v. LeBeouf Bros. Towing, LLC
as 2:2012cv02002
Plaintiff:
John Brooks
Defendant:
LeBeouf Bros. Towing, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216
Ralleigh et al v. Monaco Coach Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01215
Plaintiff:
Earl Ralleigh , Margaret Nevels , John Washington and others
Defendant:
Monaco Coach Corporation, American International Specialty Lines, Insurance Company of the State of PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. LeBeouf Bros. Towing, LLC
as 3:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
John Brooks
Defendant:
LeBeouf Bros. Towing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Eric Tillotson v. City of El Paso, et al
as 10-50141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC A. TILLOTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF EL PASO, EL PASO POLICE DEPARTMENT, STARBUCKS COFFEE CO and others
Brooks v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2009cv00706
Plaintiff:
John Brooks and John Brooks
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schexnayder et al v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
as 2:2008cv01766
Plaintiff:
Gloria Schexnayder, Joseph Broussard, Tangela Pappillion-Semien and others
Defendant:
Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Brooks v. Cain
as 08-30322
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Brooks, et al v. Cain
as 08-30200
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
