Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Rosero v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2022cv00732
Plaintiff:
Dr. John Charles Rosero
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOUSER v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BEAVER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, et al
as 2:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHARLES HOUSER
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BEAVER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, JULIEANE SWAIN and JULIANE EDNA FRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSER v. SHOUPPE et al
as 2:2022cv00437
Petitioner:
JOHN CHARLES HOUSER
Respondent:
WARDEN WILLIAM SHOUPPE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kenney v. USA
as 1:2016cv01188
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Charles Kenney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenney v. Thomas
as 1:2014cv01030
Petitioner:
John Charles Kenney
Respondent:
Jeffrey E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ADAMS et al v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
TITUS ADAMS , CARLENCE MITCHELL , BRANDON HAMPTON and others
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenney v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv02887
Plaintiff:
John Charles Kenney
Defendant:
Jeffrey E. Thomas, Sarah Dees, Andrew M. Edinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenney v. Thomas
as 1:2013cv02743
Petitioner:
John Charles Kenney
Respondent:
Jeffrey E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mazuka v. Rice Township Police Department
as 3:2013cv02003
Plaintiff:
John Charles Mazuka
Defendant:
Rice Township Police Department and Anthony Martine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
