Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Horton v. Tayloe, et al
as 23-6139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN D. HORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD EMMITT TAYLOE, MICHAEL CHARLES FLANAGAN, GERLAD FRANK NEUWIRTH and others
Horton v. National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS)
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
John D. Horton
Defendant:
National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Horton v. Tayloe et al
as 5:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Donald Emmitt Tayloe, Michael Charles Flanagan, Gerald Frank Neuwirth and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Horton v. National Instant Criminal Background Check System
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
John D. Horton
Defendant:
National Instant Criminal Background Check System
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Horton v. Garland
as 22-6193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN D. HORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Horton v. Garland
as 5:2022cv00894
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Horton v. Hoffman, et al
as 22-6122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN D. HORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JARED HOFFMAN, Lawton Postmaster and STEPHEN ESCHENBACHER, Oklahoma-Arkansas District Supervisor
Horton v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Federal Personnel Records Center and National Guard Bureau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Horton et al v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
John D Horton and Dolores M Horton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Horton v. Hoffman et al
as 5:2021cv01098
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Jared T Hoffman and Stephen Eschenbacher
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
