Cases 21 - 29 of 29
THORNTON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 4:2013cv00019
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Delgado v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2011cv05093
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Jane Doe, John Does #s 1, 2, & 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Delgado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ronald Micklas v. John Doe #1, et al
as 11-12445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD MICKLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE #1, (Reviewer No.1), JOHN DOE #2, (Reviewer No. 2) and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, in his Official Capacity
Mesias v. John Doe (SSI Rep)
as 1:2011cv02373
Defendant:
John Doe (SSI Rep)
Plaintiff:
Joel Mesias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Doe v. Astrue
as 4:2009cv01954
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cintron v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2009cv09039
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Cintron
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
John Doe 09cv4363 v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2009cv04363
Plaintiff:
John Doe 09cv4363
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Twelve John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Doe v. Astrue
as 4:2009cv04049
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Banks v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2007cv04481
Plaintiff:
Reginald Keith Banks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Jo Anne B Barnhardt, Horace Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
