Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,955
Dudley v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00543
Plaintiff: Robert Vincent Dudley
Defendant: Semple, City of Sommers, State of Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00546
Plaintiff: Thomas Knight
Defendant: Semple and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easton v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff: Curtis D. Easton
Defendant: T Oliver and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Caplan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00533
Plaintiff: Taavon Jackson
Defendant: Jean Caplan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. CT Department of Correction Comishinor et al
as 3:2024cv00515
Plaintiff: Jason Barker
Defendant: CT Department of Correction Comishinor, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHOES et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00364
Plaintiff: SHOES and M. Alicea X.
Defendant: Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Garner Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mustafa v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff: Wasim Mustafa
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latino v. Dept. of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff: David Latino
Defendant: Dept. of Correction and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antar v. Torres Shlatz et al
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff: Theodora F. Antar
Defendant: Jessica C Torres Shlatz, State of Connecticut, William T. Cremins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?